Comparison Table

Consensus Models Compared

Dimension

PoW (Bitcoin)

PoS (Ethereum & others)

PoV — EDMA L2 (RWA-native)

Basis of trust

Computation (hash power)

Staked capital

Verified evidence of real-world events

Security anchor

Difficulty & energy cost

Slashing & validator sets

Multi-source verification + PoVGate + OneClaimLedger; Ethereum anchors finality

Who can participate

Miners with hardware & cheap power

Token holders/validators with capital

Any producer/trader with verifiable data (households, SMEs, corporates)

Energy usage

High

Low

Low

Capital intensity

Medium (hardware)

High (stake)

Low (evidence, not stake)

Throughput / fees

Low / high

Medium–high / lower

High / low — L2 tuned for RWA flows

Censorship resistance

Strong

Strong–medium

Strong; invalid without evidence, not opinion

Double-counting risk

Not addressed natively

Not addressed natively

Eliminated by OneClaimLedger (one claim → one asset)

Real-world linkage

None (by design)

Indirect (apps)

Native — settlement gated by verified reality

Primary attack surface

51% hash attack

Stake cartel / governance capture

Data forgery/corruption → mitigated via IoT attestations, registry cross-checks, satellite/AI oracles

Compliance & audit

Off-chain processes

App-level

Chain-level attestations; auditable proofs on-chain

Who “wins” structurally

Cheap energy miners

Large capital pools

Truthful producers & counterparties with valid evidence

Who’s excluded

Those without hardware/power

Those without stake

Bad actors; unverifiable claims

Best-fit use cases

Digital money, SoV

DeFi, general apps

Energy, carbon, commodity trade, logistics settlement

Examples

Bitcoin, Litecoin

Ethereum, Polygon

EDMA (PoV L2)

Last updated